Post clarification
I need to clarify a comment from an earlier post. I wrote:
Critics of mine claim that the free market of development will provide what we envision. I believe that view is sorely shortsighted. We have seen time and time again in other regional communities like Mercer Island, Mill Creek, Bothell, Sammamish, and repeated by developers on several occasions that the key to seeing successful community development is the following:
- A clear set of development guidelines
- That are consistently applied
- That work toward a central vision
I did not intend to imply that cities like Mercer Island have used the same development regulations as we have recently adopted in Newcastle. My only intention was to say that the 3 points I list are what have been key success factors for each of the those communities. And that I believe our new regulations bring us closer to meeting those 3 points.
Newspaper editorial insightI want to clarify the use of Carol Simpson's phrase "need a time-out" in her June 1st Newcastle News letter to the editor. This appears to be a dig at me and a comment I made nearly a year ago when the council was voting to impose a development moratorium in the CBC.
Now why did I use this phrase? The context of my statement was in regard to the fact that I felt the city council was divided and our city codes were all over the map when concerning our development codes. I felt the codes were inconsistent with the visions and the visions among the councilors were varied. Now fortunately for the city we have documents that specify each of these things and planners must adhere to them when allowing new buildings. So the "time-out" was for us, the council, to step back and take stock of our regulations and for us to get back on one page. It was not intended as a slight to any of the property owners or businesses. A majority of the council concluded that the currently adopted CBC master plan contained the correct vision but a number of items in our code needed to be reviewed for consistency. My feeling was that our existing code allowed a type of development that was severely inconsistent with the vision laid out in the CBC plan and it needed to be corrected.
The council should be lifting the moratorium at our next meeting on June 19th, and I still think the decision to impose such a restriction for the past 12 months was a prudent one.
What about public improvements?Currently the only public project for the CBC in the works are intersection improvements to Coal Creek Pkwy and Newcastle way. While these improvements are highly needed, I don't think they are a significant enough investment to spur additional development in the CBC. I think the best potential investment the city could make would be to invest in a public parking structure that would remove most of the parking burden for developers. Then i think we could see development happen rather quickly since structured parking is the one item that is repeatedly mentioned as cost-prohibitive for the type of mixed-use development we are looking for. Unfortunately with big projects like Coal Creek Parkway widening consuming most of our resources, a project like this is probably many years away.
These new regulations actually deter developmentDuring our last council meeting a public comment was made to the effect that the new development regulation requiring a minimum density for development would "freeze the downtown into a block of ice, and by not allowing the development of a low-density, pad-style developments like Blockbuster Video, we will lose out on potential taxes in the near term".
In the short term those types of developments could be a small benefit to the city, but long-term would be harder to re-develop than if the market just waited a few years due to the density requirement. Continuing to allow the market to build that style of development is not in my mind in the best interest of the city long term.
Other items of noteCandidate filing has ended. All four council seats are contested and will make for a very noisy election season here in Newcastle. The good news is that there will be at least 3 new faces on the council this year after 3 incumbents decided not to seek re-election.
The city council will be holding a study session on emergency management at 8pm on Tuesday June 26th in the city hall chambers. The public is encouraged to attend.